logo



Wilson among most migrated to counties

Staff Reports • Oct 6, 2017 at 3:19 PM

Wilson County is among the top five most migrated to counties in the state, according to a University of Tennessee study.

While the population in Tennessee’s metropolitan counties is expected to continue to grow, many rural counties are expected to see decreases in the coming decades, according to new projections released Friday by the University of Tennessee’s Boyd Center for Business and Economic Research.

The new projections estimate by 2040, Tennessee’s population is expected to grow to 7.84 million people, with expected growth of about 50,000 people per year. That trend is consistent to population growth observed from 2010 to 2016 but lower than the average annual increases of about 65,500, which happened in the 2000s. The lower growth in those years was due to trends in births, deaths and net migration.

“All in all, these emerging trends imply changes in the expected demographic profile of the state. In the future, there is expected to be fewer working age individuals per retiree and greater racial and ethnic diversity,” said Matt Harris, the study’s lead researcher. “Most of these patterns in Tennessee are reflective of national trends.”

The study projects growth and declines for each Tennessee county by race, age and sex for each year from 2016 to 2070. These projections are informed by several emerging trends in population over the last decade including changes in births, deaths and net migration.

Davidson, Rutherford, Williamson, Wilson and Sumner counties accounted for 38 percent of all net migration in Tennessee. In the current decade, the same five counties have absorbed 62 percent of all net migration in Tennessee.

Natural population growth – the combined effects of births and deaths – in the state has fallen sharply because of increased deaths and decreased births. In 2007, Tennessee’s population grew by almost 30,000 because of births and deaths alone. In 2015, the natural change was only 15,000, with two-thirds of that decrease coming from increases in deaths rather than decreases in births.

The decrease in natural growth was not distributed evenly across the state, but was concentrated in nonurban counties.

 

Recommended for You