Senate set to vote on drones bill

A bill requiring warrants to use drones for surveillance is expected to make its way to the Senate floor for debate next week. The “Freedom from Unwarranted Surveillance Act" prohibits the use of drones for surveillance except in limited circumstances. “All we’re d...
Apr 5, 2013

A bill requiring warrants to use drones for surveillance is expected to make its way to the Senate floor for debate next week.

The “Freedom from Unwarranted Surveillance Act" prohibits the use of drones for surveillance except in limited circumstances.

“All we’re doing is bringing the law to catch up with the new technology,” said Sen. Mae Beavers, the bill’s sponsor.

Drones, unmanned aerial vehicles that can be equipped with weapons or surveillance equipment, have been used for years by the Department of Defense in military applications. A bill passed March 6 in the U.S. House would require the Department of Defense to reveal any military drones used domestically to conduct surveillance on American citizens.

But drone use is not limited to the military.

In 2012, 81 organizations – including military branches, law enforcement agencies, colleges and universities – applied for drone licensure from the FAA, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Among those organizations were Middle Tennessee State University and Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

“In the process of all this, I found out that Metro Nashville owns two and Memphis has one,” said Beavers, R-Mt. Juliet.

The bill requires law enforcement get search warrants before using drones to get evidence through surveillance.

“We just want to make sure they’re not used to spy on people without the police first having to obtain a warrant,” said Beavers.

Any evidence obtained without a warrant would not be admissible in court, and anyone falling prey to unwarranted surveillance by a drone would be eligible to file a lawsuit under the proposed bill.

The two notable exceptions when a warrant would not be required is when there is specific and credible threat of a terrorist attack or if law enforcement has reason to believe there’s imminent danger to life.

The bill passed unanimously in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday.

“I expected it to pass, but I wasn’t sure it would pass unanimously,” said Beavers.

The House version, sponsored by freshman Rep. Micah Van Huss, R-Jonesborough, is scheduled for consideration in the House Calendar and Rules Committee.

Log in or sign up to post comments.