Historians will continue to debate whether or not FDR’s busy-work policies and alphabet soup agencies ended or exacerbated the depression, but one thing is for certain. His presidency set a high watermark for optimism for the country at large and the Democrat Party specifically.
That optimism enjoyed a brief resurgence under John F. Kennedy that his assassination seemed to have stripped from the party permanently. Bill Clinton managed to put a happy face on the pessimistic party, but even his rise to power was on the back of a commodity the Democrats have mined and traded now for half a century. That commodity is fear itself.
While Ronald Reagan was restoring the country’s sense of self-worth, a new cult of despair was in its infancy. It was called the global warming movement. Its godfather, James Hansen, was taking a cue from Paul Ehrlich and his wildly successful freak-out, the Population Bomb. Ehrlich confidently and boldly predicted in 1970, “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next 10 years.” He took the occasion of the first Earth Day in 1970 to predict 4 billion people would die sometime between 1980 and 1989 in the “Great Die-Off.”
We’ve had nearly 50 years to assess the utter absurdity of Ehrlich’s predictions, yet he still stands by most of them. That’s what happens when you go all in on fear. There’s no backing down without totally destroying your reputation in the process.
Such now is the fate of the global warming alarmists. They have peddled fear for a demonstrable 30-year period, a timespan that scientists and political observers can assess for its accuracy, or lack thereof. Philip Shabecoff, an environmental reporter for the New York Times, wrote in June 1988, “The rise in global temperature is predicted to cause sea levels to rise by 1-4 feet by the middle of the next century.” While we haven’t reached the middle of the century, we are nearly halfway there. On the low end, sea levels should’ve risen by 6 inches. Of course, they haven’t.
Liberals, devoid of positive ideas of their own, have resorted to exploiting not only fear, but also guilt. You’re destroying the planet so you must do something about it. You have too much, and you’re far too comfortable so you must do something about it. All of the great guilt-and-fear schemes from peak oil to global warming to the population bomb have something else in common other than guilt and fear. Redistribution of wealth. If you’ve managed to work hard and produce, it’s somehow your fault that others have not.
Now, that’s not to say that misfortune doesn’t befall people for no apparent reason, but history teaches us that misfortune has visited many successful people. It’s how they deal with that misfortune that makes the difference.
The volume of hysteria among the liberals increases with each new bit of economic news. One would think that black and Hispanic unemployment at historic lows would be cause for celebration. It is only if you measure success by the normal metrics of success. It’s bad news if you measure it only by fear.
Phil Valentine is a nationally syndicated talk radio host. Find him at philvalentine.com.